Home
Psycho Circus

Psycho Circus in Bloomington, MN
Current price: $29.99
Loading Inventory...
Size: OS
Since the 1996 reunion tour was a blockbuster success,
Paul Stanley
and
Gene Simmons
decided to keep
Peter Criss
Ace Frehley
around for a little while longer -- long enough to record a full-fledged reunion album,
Psycho Circus
. Anyone expecting a stylistic breakthrough from a reunited (allegedly revitalized)
Kiss
would be unfamiliar with the band's history. Throughout the years, the only real change has been in the guitarists and drummers; the band's sleazy, big, dumb
pop-metal
has remained the same. The problem is, it's the kind of music that sounds more convincing when it's performed by a young, hungry band that makes records on the cheap. That way, the albums really sound as sleazy as the men who make them. As the band pushes 50,
no longer sound young, hungry, or sleazy -- they sound like professional dirty old men. And since they're professionals, they can turn out some catchy hooks when called upon, but
ultimately feels worn out, more of a huge advertisement for an impending tour than a full-fledged record. Certainly, they're crafty enough to toss out a few anthems to please fans (
"I Pledge Allegiance to the State of Rock & Roll,"
"You Wanted the Best"
), and that may be enough to appease fans longing for an album by a reunited
, especially since
Frehley
is a better, more charismatic guitarist than anyone else that has floated through the band. But cynics (i.e., anyone who isn't a hardcore fan) will probably view it as pandering. Which raises an interesting question: who is more cynical,
for writing fan-baiting
rock & roll
anthems simply to sell records, or the reviewers who call them on it? ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine
Paul Stanley
and
Gene Simmons
decided to keep
Peter Criss
Ace Frehley
around for a little while longer -- long enough to record a full-fledged reunion album,
Psycho Circus
. Anyone expecting a stylistic breakthrough from a reunited (allegedly revitalized)
Kiss
would be unfamiliar with the band's history. Throughout the years, the only real change has been in the guitarists and drummers; the band's sleazy, big, dumb
pop-metal
has remained the same. The problem is, it's the kind of music that sounds more convincing when it's performed by a young, hungry band that makes records on the cheap. That way, the albums really sound as sleazy as the men who make them. As the band pushes 50,
no longer sound young, hungry, or sleazy -- they sound like professional dirty old men. And since they're professionals, they can turn out some catchy hooks when called upon, but
ultimately feels worn out, more of a huge advertisement for an impending tour than a full-fledged record. Certainly, they're crafty enough to toss out a few anthems to please fans (
"I Pledge Allegiance to the State of Rock & Roll,"
"You Wanted the Best"
), and that may be enough to appease fans longing for an album by a reunited
, especially since
Frehley
is a better, more charismatic guitarist than anyone else that has floated through the band. But cynics (i.e., anyone who isn't a hardcore fan) will probably view it as pandering. Which raises an interesting question: who is more cynical,
for writing fan-baiting
rock & roll
anthems simply to sell records, or the reviewers who call them on it? ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine