The following text field will produce suggestions that follow it as you type.

Barnes and Noble

Loading Inventory...
Machine Learning for Experiments the Social SciencesMachine Learning for Experiments the Social Sciences

Machine Learning for Experiments the Social Sciences in Bloomington, MN

By Barnes & Noble

Current price: $25.00
Get it at Barnes and Noble
Machine Learning for Experiments the Social Sciences

Machine Learning for Experiments the Social Sciences in Bloomington, MN

Current price: $25.00
Loading Inventory...

Size: EBook

Get it at Barnes and Noble
Causal inference and machine learning are typically introduced in the social sciences separately as theoretically distinct methodological traditions. However, applications of machine learning in causal inference are increasingly prevalent. This Element provides theoretical and practical introductions to machine learning for social scientists interested in applying such methods to experimental data. We show how machine learning can be useful for conducting robust causal inference and provide a theoretical foundation researchers can use to understand and apply new methods in this rapidly developing field. We then demonstrate two specific methods – the prediction rule ensemble and the causal random forest – for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in survey experiments and testing the extent to which such heterogeneity is robust to out-of-sample prediction. We conclude by discussing limitations and tradeoffs of such methods, while directing readers to additional related methods available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
Causal inference and machine learning are typically introduced in the social sciences separately as theoretically distinct methodological traditions. However, applications of machine learning in causal inference are increasingly prevalent. This Element provides theoretical and practical introductions to machine learning for social scientists interested in applying such methods to experimental data. We show how machine learning can be useful for conducting robust causal inference and provide a theoretical foundation researchers can use to understand and apply new methods in this rapidly developing field. We then demonstrate two specific methods – the prediction rule ensemble and the causal random forest – for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in survey experiments and testing the extent to which such heterogeneity is robust to out-of-sample prediction. We conclude by discussing limitations and tradeoffs of such methods, while directing readers to additional related methods available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).

Find at Mall of America® in Bloomington, MN

Visit at Mall of America® in Bloomington, MN
Powered by Adeptmind